Biosensors
Viewpoints
2010
2009
-
December/January:
2009: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2010 -
November:
-
October:
Lab-on-a-Chip Biosensors
Recent Developments: Whole-Genome Sequencing: Closer to Commercialization -
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2008
-
December/January:
2008: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2009 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
Archived Viewpoints
2007
-
December/January:
2007: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2008 -
November:
Thin-Film Batteries: Powering Innovations in Biosensor Technology?
-
October:
Environmental Biosensors: Screening Contaminated Air, Land, and Water
-
September:
-
August:
Biosensors for Label-Free Detection of Molecular Interactions
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
Curing Diabetes: Disruptive Technologies for Blood-Glucose Biosensors
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
Surface-Plasmon-Resonance Biosensors: Players and Developments
2006
-
December/January:
2006: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2007 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
Nanotechnology and Biosensors
New Technology Area: Connected Homes -
May:
Nanotechnology, Biosensors—and Pasta
Recent Developments: New Biosensors Market Data -
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2005
-
December/January:
2005: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2006 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
Optical Biosensors for Cancer Management
Recent Developments: Enzyme-Powered Fuel Cell -
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2004
-
December/January:
2004: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2005 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2003
-
December/January:
2003: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2004 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
Recent Developments: MEMS Technology Services from MST-charged | EU-Funded biosensor Research
-
March:
-
February:
2002
-
December/January:
2002: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2003 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
Ongoing EC-Funded Biosensor Research
Recent Developments: Microcantilever Biosensor -
April:
-
March:
-
February:
Cloned Pigs and Rejection-Free Transplants
Recent Developments: Live Spores for Real-Time Biosensing
2001
-
December/January:
2001: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2002 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
Activites at Oxford Biosensors
Recent Developments: Nucleic Acid Biosensor -
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2000
-
December/January:
2000: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2001 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
Advances in Optical Biosensors
Recent Developments: Technique for Synthesizing Antibody Substitutes -
August:
-
July:
Patient Monitoring System for Prostate Cancer
Recent Developments: New Coatings and Clots -
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
1999
-
December/January:
1999: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2000 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
Before August 1999, the Explorer service was called TechMonitoring, and Viewpoints were TechLinks.
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
1998
-
December/January:
1998: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1999 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
1997
-
December/January:
1997: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1998 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
Transplantation Therapy for Diabetics
Recent Developments: Biacore's New Sensor Probe -
April:
Quantech to Introduce SPR-Based Biosensor in 1997
Recent Developments: A Biosensor for E. coli -
March:
-
February:
1996
-
December/January:
1996: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1997 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
European Research into Sensors for In Vivo Glucose Monitoring
-
February:
-
December/January:
1995: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1996
About This Technology
Biosensors represent a powerful technology development in analytical measurement. Biosensors have the ability to measure the presence, absence, or concentration of specific organic or inorganic substances and to do so accurately, with rapid response time, and with high levels of specificity. Their perceived advantages over existing technologies include the ability to monitor broad or narrow spectra of analytes in real time and to allow decentralized analyte testing at the level of single-molecule interactions. Their perceived weaknesses include the instability of the biological molecules outside their natural environment, which results in a restricted shelf life and intensive research and development requirements.
Biosensors find commercial application in the areas of health care, food-quality control, pharmaceuticals, and environmental monitoring and greatest use in health care—especially in patient monitoring. A common requirement of all these applications is on-site analysis, preferably on a real-time basis. The resulting benefits of closer monitoring range from a more efficient industrial productions process to better-informed legislation on safety standards and population exposure to chemical and biological hazards. However, the market demand for biosensors in nonhealth applications will accelerate only when cheap and reliable biosensor technologies become available. The apparent opportunities in biosensor commercialization have led to interest by many large electronic and life science companies. However, without the technical skills, the delivery channels, or a unique, differentiated, biosensor offering, players will have great difficulty entering the market. Given the cost and complexity of biosensor development, a model of strategic cooperation is finding wide adoption.
Bottlenecks in the technical development of biosensors include the difficulty of fabricating devices in bulk and the single- or restricted multiple-use nature of most biosensors currently available (leading to the need continuously to repurchase device components as well as consumables). In addition, the combination of electronic and biological components in a working device is difficult and expensive to achieve and requires significant cross-discipline research. The high cost of biosensor development reduces the potential for biosensor use in low-cost applications. Because several competing technologies to biosensors exist (including dipstick tests and such laboratory techniques as spectrophotometry), the commercial success of biosensors hinges on their use in applications where they have a unique performance advantage such as simplicity of use, greater sensitivity, faster response time, or the ability to monitor an analyte continuously. Even in the largest markets (such as glucose monitoring) that biosensors can access, competition on price or technology alone is unlikely to form the basis of a successful strategy.


